|
|
|
|
THE
PARABLE OF THE TWO DEBTORS (Luke 7:36-50) 36
Now one of the Pharisees[1] invited Jesus to have dinner
with him, so he went to the Pharisee’s house and reclined at the table.
SUMMARY
OF THE PARABLE
Luke
alone records the incident that led to this parable and the parable
itself. This is a story
about how God’s forgiveness makes people loving.
Jesus teaches that the more people are forgiven, the more
they will love. That
is, love is one evidence of forgiveness.
The woman, a well-known sinner, was overwhelmed with love for
Jesus who could meet her need, so she received forgiveness.
The love she showed Jesus sprang from her faith in him (50). Unfortunately, it is also a story of a religious man without
love. Simon the Pharisee
was conscious of no need and so received no forgiveness and therefore
felt no love. Perhaps the
greatest of sins is to be unaware of sin. A
PARABLE OF CONTRASTS
This
parable is a story of contrasts between the two debtors, the amount
of debt, the forgiveness of the debts, and the contrasting gratitude
of the debtors.
In this story God or Christ, is the creditor, humanity is the
debtors, and our sins the debts (Matthew 6:12).
The two debtors represent the woman and Simon.
The woman, “who had lived a sinful life”, owed 500 denarii
and Simon, the comparatively upright Pharisee, owed 50 denarii. These were large debts as one denarius was worth a day’s wages.
The proportion of the two debts represents the different views
that Simon and the woman had towards their own sinfulness. Although
the sums vary in the proportion of ten to one, there is no calculable
difference between the sins that one person and another person commit
against God. Both Simon
and the woman were sinners and both were bankrupt and could not pay
their debt to God, only Simon did not realize it.
Her sins were known whereas Simon’s sins were hidden to everyone
except Jesus. Simon’s pride and indifference to Jesus were in sharp contrast
to the humility and affection of the woman towards Jesus.
Whereas the woman was guilty of sins of commission, Simon was
guilty of sins of omission. EASTERN CUSTOMS OF HOSPITALITYJesus
had been invited to the home of a Pharisee for a meal.
The sandals were removed at meals and the guests reclined on
their elbows with their feet stretched out behind them (38) instead
of sitting on chairs. When
a rabbi was at a public meal in an open courtyard, it was accepted that
all kinds of people were free to attend also.
That explains the presence of the woman, although women were
not usually invited to a public meal.
Usually the rabbis of that time never talked with a woman in
public if they could help it, and if they did, their conduct was exceptional
(John 4:27). Moreover,
a woman of this type would not be welcome in the house of a Pharisee. When
a guest entered a house three things were always done:
the host gave him a kiss of peace as a mark of respect; water was poured
over his sandaled feet to cleanse them; and olive oil was placed on
his head. Good manners
required that these things were done, but in this case not one of them
was done for Jesus. SIMON
THE PHARISEE: PROUD, UNFORGIVEN AND UNLOVING
The
critical Simon showed no love to Jesus.
Simon was the typical Pharisee, very sure of what the Law required
of him and incapable of seeing that there were circumstances where the
law of love, “Love your neighbour as yourself”, was more important
than his own religious rules and regulations.
He probably invited Jesus only because he was a celebrity or
perhaps he was curious about Jesus.
However, he gave him none of the attention that a guest usually
received. Simon
received Jesus with formal politeness.
Did Simon think he was too good to treat Jesus as an equal? He judged Jesus by his own rules and despised Jesus for not
pushing the woman away as he thought a touch by a sinner brought ceremonial
uncleanness (39). Simon
was publicly embarrassed by the way Jesus accepted the respect of a
prostitute. His attitude
of superiority and smug self-righteousness cut him off from receiving
forgiveness or showing love. Simon
judged entirely by appearances.
His major problem was blindness (44); he could not see himself,
the woman or Jesus. While
he could say, “She is a sinner” (39), he could not say, “I am
a sinner.” Simon
answered Jesus correctly (43) that gratitude is usually in proportion
to benefits received. But
forgiveness for Simon was a legalistic transaction between a person
and God. His sins were of a subtler kind, sins of the mind and spirit
rather than the flesh – religious pride, discourtesy, self-conceit and
contempt for other people.
He was like that other Pharisee who went up to the temple to
pray (Luke 18: 9-14). THE
UNNAMED WOMAN: REPENTANT, FORGIVEN AND LOVING
Unlike
Simon the broken woman, who was probably a prostitute, knew she was
a sinner. She followed
Jesus and gate-crashed the party because previously he had not only
revealed her sin, but also offered her acceptance.
That Jesus could so forgive and love filled her with a love that
overflowed in passionate gratitude.
For a Jewish woman to appear in public with her hair unbound
was very immodest. It was
a sign of respect to pour oil or perfume on someone’s head.
Perhaps she felt unworthy to anoint Jesus’ head, so she anointed
his feet with perfume that was possibly bought with her immoral earnings.
This act was a costly outlay for the woman was not wealthy.
She constantly kissed his feet as a sign of respect, affection
and submission. Her
actions and the devotion she lavished on Jesus, all show the effects
of forgiveness. She loved
Jesus too much to care what people thought.
The important point of the parable is that the woman’s actions
did not earn forgiveness for her; it was the spontaneous love of a person
who was aware of being forgiven. THE
FORGIVING SAVIOUR
Jesus understood what was happening and he made his point to Simon with a parable. Too polite to expose him at his own table, Jesus like Nathan with King David used a parable[3], and made him pronounce both the woman’s approval and his own condemnation. In this incident, it is the generous prostitute who receives forgiveness, not the mean-spirited Pharisee. Everything that Simon neglected to do, the woman did, and she did it better (44-46). There is a double contrast between his not anointing the head and her anointing the feet; and between his withholding common olive oil for the higher purpose, and her using the precious perfume for the humbler purpose. Jesus
knew the history of this woman.
He made it clear that it was her faith that saved her (50) for
good works are not able to save us (Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:4-7).
Her tears and the gift of costly ointment were the evidence of
her faith. Faith plus
works do not save us; we are saved by a faith that results in works
(James 2:14-26). This unnamed
woman illustrates Galatians 5:6, “The only thing that counts is faith
expressing itself through love”. To
make verse 47 consistent with the rest of the parable we must assume
that the woman had previously repented, and received an assurance of
forgiveness, hence her love and gratitude.
Verse 47 does not teach justification by works; she was not forgiven
because of her love; her love was the evidence of a repentant heart
and the forgiveness she had received. CONCLUSION:
LOVE IS THE TEST OF FORGIVENESS
Forgiveness
is a gift of God’s grace;
Jesus Christ paid the debt of sin in full (Ephesians 1:7; 1 Peter 1:18-19). However much difference there is among people, all of us need
the forgiving mercy of God.
Respectable Simon must be saved on the same terms as this
still despised woman. Forgiveness
of sin comes to those who have ceased to trust in their own righteousness
and have placed their faith in the mercy of God in Christ. Jesus
showed that the one who realizes the depth of her/his own sin, and the
greatness of God’s mercy, should love as this woman did.
Jesus contrasted Simon’s lack of courtesy with the devotion of
this woman, and implied that Simon had not experienced a deep forgiveness.
Love for God is weak where consciousness of sin is weak.
Her love resulted from her forgiveness.
Faith allowed her to receive forgiveness (50), and the realization
of forgiveness was expressed in thankful love.
“Saved” (50) can mean “made whole” either in a physical
or in a spiritual sense. The
latter meaning is intended here.
The main idea of salvation is deliverance. FOOD
FOR THOUGHT
SOMETHING
TO PRAY
Lord
Jesus, make us sensitive to sin, give us a deeper sense of sin and a
thankful awareness of what it cost you to redeem us to yourself. Jim Peacock M A (Hons), Diploma of Teaching. [1]The Pharisees were a religious group with political influence. Originally they had a sincere desire to please God by keeping his laws. Regrettably they did this by adding many petty rules of their own until they had over 600! They also separated themselves from social outcasts. The Pharisees often clashed with Jesus who contradicted their extra-biblical regulations and called them proud self-righteous hypocrites. However, not all the Pharisees were insincere. Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea and Saul, later Paul the apostle, became followers of Jesus. [2]
The silver denarius was a Roman coin equivalent to about
a
day’s wage for a labourer in first century Palestine. [3] 2 Samuel chapter 12. |